You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emergent Oscillations in Networks of Stochastic Spiking Neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Wallace, Marc Benayoun, Wim van Drongelen, Jack D. Cowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 169 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 27% |
| Researcher | 46 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 36 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 28 | 15% |
| Engineering | 28 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,366,818
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,170
of 195,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,359
of 110,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,172
of 1,573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.