You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002009.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jayesh Bhatt, Nikki Jahnke, Alan R Smyth |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 55 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,339,261
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,259
of 12,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,174
of 341,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.