↓ Skip to main content

Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002009.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayesh Bhatt, Nikki Jahnke, Alan R Smyth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 15 28%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 46%
Unspecified 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,911,129
of 14,596,248 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,563
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,934
of 258,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,596,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.