↓ Skip to main content

The SpikerBox: A Low Cost, Open-Source BioAmplifier for Increasing Public Participation in Neuroscience Inquiry

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
46 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The SpikerBox: A Low Cost, Open-Source BioAmplifier for Increasing Public Participation in Neuroscience Inquiry
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy C. Marzullo, Gregory J. Gage

Abstract

Although people are generally interested in how the brain functions, neuroscience education for the public is hampered by a lack of low cost and engaging teaching materials. To address this, we developed an open-source tool, the SpikerBox, which is appropriate for use in middle/high school educational programs and by amateurs. This device can be used in easy experiments in which students insert sewing pins into the leg of a cockroach, or other invertebrate, to amplify and listen to the electrical activity of neurons. With the cockroach leg preparation, students can hear and see (using a smartphone oscilloscope app we have developed) the dramatic changes in activity caused by touching the mechanosensitive barbs. Students can also experiment with other manipulations such as temperature, drugs, and microstimulation that affect the neural activity. We include teaching guides and other resources in the supplemental materials. These hands-on lessons with the SpikerBox have proven to be effective in teaching basic neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 174 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 21 11%
Other 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 23%
Neuroscience 26 14%
Engineering 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Psychology 10 5%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 42 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#460,789
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,419
of 224,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,011
of 173,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#82
of 3,703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.