You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Observational Cohort Comparison of Facilitators of Retention in Care and Adherence to Anti-Eetroviral Therapy at an HIV Treatment Center in Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loice Achieng, Helen Musangi, Sharon Ong'uti, Edwin Ombegoh, LeeAnn Bryant, Jonathan Mwiindi, Nathaniel Smith, Philip Keiser |
| Abstract |
Most HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings utilize multiple facilitators of adherence and retention in care but there is little data on the efficacy of these methods. We performed an observational cohort analysis of a treatment program in Kenya to assess which program components promote adherence and retention in HIV care in East Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,221,220
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#109,082
of 219,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,523
of 162,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,336
of 3,522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.