↓ Skip to main content

Learning about the Functions of the Olfactory System from People without a Sense of Smell

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning about the Functions of the Olfactory System from People without a Sense of Smell
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilona Croy, Simona Negoias, Lenka Novakova, Basile N. Landis, Thomas Hummel

Abstract

The olfactory system provides numerous functions to humans, influencing ingestive behavior, awareness of environmental hazards and social communication. Approximately 1/5 of the general population exhibit an impaired sense of smell. However, in contrast to the many affected, only few patients complain of their impairment. So how important is it for humans to have an intact sense of smell? Or is it even dispensable, at least in the Western world? To investigate this, we compared 32 patients, who were born without a sense of smell (isolated congenital anosmia--ICA) with 36 age-matched controls. A broad questionnaire was used, containing domains relevant to olfaction in daily life, along with a questionnaire about social relationships and the BDI-questionnaire. ICA-patients differed only slightly from controls in functions of daily life related to olfaction. These differences included enhanced social insecurity, increased risk for depressive symptoms and increased risk for household accidents. In these domains the sense of olfaction seems to play a key role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Czechia 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 18%
Psychology 27 18%
Neuroscience 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#622,231
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,412
of 222,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,781
of 172,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#107
of 3,730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.