↓ Skip to main content

Class War in the Voting Booth: Bias Against High‐Income Congressional Candidates

Overview of attention for article published in Legislative Studies Quarterly, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Class War in the Voting Booth: Bias Against High‐Income Congressional Candidates
Published in
Legislative Studies Quarterly, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/lsq.12253
Authors

John D. Griffin, Brian Newman, Patrick Buhr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,536,168
of 13,668,802 outputs
Outputs from Legislative Studies Quarterly
#54
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,238
of 240,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legislative Studies Quarterly
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,668,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.