You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The protective effect and mechanism of catalpol on high glucose-induced podocyte injury
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2019
Yan Chen, Qingpu Liu, Zengfu Shan, Yingying Zhao, Meng Li, Baiyan Wang, Xiaoke Zheng, Weisheng Feng
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||18%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||9%|
|Student > Master||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||18%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||18%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
of 3,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 340,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.