↓ Skip to main content

Structure-Forming Corals and Sponges and Their Use as Fish Habitat in Bering Sea Submarine Canyons

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure-Forming Corals and Sponges and Their Use as Fish Habitat in Bering Sea Submarine Canyons
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033885
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Miller, John Hocevar, Robert P. Stone, Dmitry V. Fedorov

Abstract

Continental margins are dynamic, heterogeneous settings that can include canyons, seamounts, and banks. Two of the largest canyons in the world, Zhemchug and Pribilof, cut into the edge of the continental shelf in the southeastern Bering Sea. Here currents and upwelling interact to produce a highly productive area, termed the Green Belt, that supports an abundance of fishes and squids as well as birds and marine mammals. We show that in some areas the floor of these canyons harbors high densities of gorgonian and pennatulacean corals and sponges, likely due to enhanced surface productivity, benthic currents and seafloor topography. Rockfishes, including the commercially important Pacific ocean perch, Sebastes alutus, were associated with corals and sponges as well as with isolated boulders. Sculpins, poachers and pleuronectid flounders were also associated with corals in Pribilof Canyon, where corals were most abundant. Fishes likely use corals and sponges as sources of vertical relief, which may harbor prey as well as provide shelter from predators. Boulders may be equivalent habitat in this regard, but are sparse in the canyons, strongly suggesting that biogenic structure is important fish habitat. Evidence of disturbance to the benthos from fishing activities was observed in these remote canyons. Bottom trawling and other benthic fishing gear has been shown to damage corals and sponges that may be very slow to recover from such disturbance. Regulation of these destructive practices is key to conservation of benthic habitats in these canyons and the ecosystem services they provide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 178 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 46%
Environmental Science 32 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 40 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,251,726
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,909
of 217,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,373
of 165,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#229
of 3,723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.