↓ Skip to main content

Desynchronizing effect of high-frequency stimulation in a generic cortical network model

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Desynchronizing effect of high-frequency stimulation in a generic cortical network model
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11571-012-9199-8
Authors

Markus Schütt, Jens Christian Claussen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 5%
Austria 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Researcher 6 29%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Neuroscience 4 19%
Physics and Astronomy 4 19%
Unspecified 3 14%
Computer Science 2 10%
Other 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#2,906,022
of 3,624,912 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#67
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,800
of 73,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,624,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.