↓ Skip to main content

A new view of the tree of life

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,212)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
849 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2779 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
A new view of the tree of life
Published in
Nature Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A. Hug, Brett J. Baker, Karthik Anantharaman, Christopher T. Brown, Alexander J. Probst, Cindy J. Castelle, Cristina N. Butterfield, Alex W. Hernsdorf, Yuki Amano, Kotaro Ise, Yohey Suzuki, Natasha Dudek, David A. Relman, Kari M. Finstad, Ronald Amundson, Brian C. Thomas, Jillian F. Banfield

Abstract

The tree of life is one of the most important organizing principles in biology(1). Gene surveys suggest the existence of an enormous number of branches(2), but even an approximation of the full scale of the tree has remained elusive. Recent depictions of the tree of life have focused either on the nature of deep evolutionary relationships(3-5) or on the known, well-classified diversity of life with an emphasis on eukaryotes(6). These approaches overlook the dramatic change in our understanding of life's diversity resulting from genomic sampling of previously unexamined environments. New methods to generate genome sequences illuminate the identity of organisms and their metabolic capacities, placing them in community and ecosystem contexts(7,8). Here, we use new genomic data from over 1,000 uncultivated and little known organisms, together with published sequences, to infer a dramatically expanded version of the tree of life, with Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya included. The depiction is both a global overview and a snapshot of the diversity within each major lineage. The results reveal the dominance of bacterial diversification and underline the importance of organisms lacking isolated representatives, with substantial evolution concentrated in a major radiation of such organisms. This tree highlights major lineages currently underrepresented in biogeochemical models and identifies radiations that are probably important for future evolutionary analyses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,771 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,779 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 43 2%
Germany 11 <1%
France 10 <1%
Brazil 10 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Belgium 5 <1%
New Zealand 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 30 1%
Unknown 2652 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 702 25%
Researcher 488 18%
Student > Master 377 14%
Student > Bachelor 316 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 153 6%
Other 451 16%
Unknown 292 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1040 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 593 21%
Environmental Science 213 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 145 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 98 4%
Other 298 11%
Unknown 392 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1797. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,028
of 15,885,275 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#3
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44
of 266,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,885,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.