↓ Skip to main content

A new view of the tree of life

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 902)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
481 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2148 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
A new view of the tree of life
Published in
Nature Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A. Hug, Brett J. Baker, Karthik Anantharaman, Christopher T. Brown, Alexander J. Probst, Cindy J. Castelle, Cristina N. Butterfield, Alex W. Hernsdorf, Yuki Amano, Kotaro Ise, Yohey Suzuki, Natasha Dudek, David A. Relman, Kari M. Finstad, Ronald Amundson, Brian C. Thomas, Jillian F. Banfield

Abstract

The tree of life is one of the most important organizing principles in biology(1). Gene surveys suggest the existence of an enormous number of branches(2), but even an approximation of the full scale of the tree has remained elusive. Recent depictions of the tree of life have focused either on the nature of deep evolutionary relationships(3-5) or on the known, well-classified diversity of life with an emphasis on eukaryotes(6). These approaches overlook the dramatic change in our understanding of life's diversity resulting from genomic sampling of previously unexamined environments. New methods to generate genome sequences illuminate the identity of organisms and their metabolic capacities, placing them in community and ecosystem contexts(7,8). Here, we use new genomic data from over 1,000 uncultivated and little known organisms, together with published sequences, to infer a dramatically expanded version of the tree of life, with Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya included. The depiction is both a global overview and a snapshot of the diversity within each major lineage. The results reveal the dominance of bacterial diversification and underline the importance of organisms lacking isolated representatives, with substantial evolution concentrated in a major radiation of such organisms. This tree highlights major lineages currently underrepresented in biogeochemical models and identifies radiations that are probably important for future evolutionary analyses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,807 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 41 2%
Germany 10 <1%
France 10 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 31 1%
Unknown 2029 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 572 27%
Researcher 388 18%
Student > Master 298 14%
Student > Bachelor 246 11%
Unspecified 172 8%
Other 471 22%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 911 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 431 20%
Unspecified 240 11%
Environmental Science 165 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 106 5%
Other 294 14%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1819. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#901
of 13,105,281 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#1
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37
of 264,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,105,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.