You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multi-Level Communication of Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells via Tunneling Nanotubes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dierk Wittig, Xiang Wang, Cindy Walter, Hans-Hermann Gerdes, Richard H. W. Funk, Cora Roehlecke |
Abstract |
Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) may offer a very specific and effective way of intercellular communication. Here we investigated TNTs in the human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line ARPE-19. Morphology of TNTs was examined by immunostaining and scanning electron microscopy. To determine the function of TNTs between cells, we studied the TNT-dependent intercellular communication at different levels including electrical and calcium signalling, small molecular diffusion as well as mitochondrial re-localization. Further, intercellular organelles transfer was assayed by FACS analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 33% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,170,310
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84,727
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,566
of 160,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,402
of 3,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.