↓ Skip to main content

N-GlycositeAtlas: a database resource for mass spectrometry-based human N-linked glycoprotein and glycosylation site mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Proteomics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
N-GlycositeAtlas: a database resource for mass spectrometry-based human N-linked glycoprotein and glycosylation site mapping
Published in
Clinical Proteomics, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12014-019-9254-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shisheng Sun, Yingwei Hu, Minghui Ao, Punit Shah, Jing Chen, Weiming Yang, Xingwang Jia, Yuan Tian, Stefani Thomas, Hui Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Chemistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#12,940,835
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#118
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,342
of 341,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.