You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of Vaccination against HPV Infections to Prevent Cervical Cancer in France: Present Assessment and Pathways to Improve Vaccination Policies
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032251 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laureen Ribassin-Majed, Rachid Lounes, Stephan Clémençon |
Abstract |
Seventy percent of sexually active individuals will be infected with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) during their lifetime. These infections are incriminated for almost all cervical cancers. In France, 3,068 new cases of cervical cancer and 1,067 deaths from cervical cancer occurred in 2005. Two vaccines against HPV infections are currently available and vaccination policies aim to decrease the incidence of HPV infections and of cervical cancers. In France, vaccine coverage has been reported to be low. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 57% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 44% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Mathematics | 6 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,378,772
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,349
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,384
of 156,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,127
of 3,510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.