You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-362-2_2 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-377-0, 978-1-59745-362-2
|
| Authors |
Gerald Adams, Adams, Gerald |
| Editors |
John G. Day, Glyn N. Stacey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,382,382
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,927
of 13,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,988
of 156,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.