↓ Skip to main content

The influence of childhood abuse, adult life events, and affective temperaments on the well-being of the general, nonclinical adult population

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of childhood abuse, adult life events, and affective temperaments on the well-being of the general, nonclinical adult population
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s100474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiaki Kanai, Yoshikazu Takaesu, Yukiei Nakai, Masahiko Ichiki, Mitsuhiko Sato, Yasunori Matsumoto, Jun Ishikawa, Yasuyuki Ono, Akiko Murakoshi, Hajime Tanabe, Ichiro Kusumi, Takeshi Inoue

Abstract

Previous studies have shown the effects of childhood abuse, life events, and temperaments on well-being (positive affect) and ill-being (negative affect). We hypothesized that childhood abuse, affective temperaments, and adult life events interact with one another and influence positive and negative affects in the general adult population and tested this hypothesis using structural equation modeling. A total of 415 participants from the general, nonclinical adult population were studied using the following self-administered questionnaires: the Subjective Well-Being Inventory (SUBI); Life Experiences Survey (LES); Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A); and the Child Abuse and Trauma Scale (CATS). The data were analyzed with single and multiple regression analyses and structural equation modeling (Mplus). Childhood abuse indirectly predicted the worsening of positive and negative affects through cyclothymic, anxious, and irritable temperaments as measured by the TEMPS-A in the structural equation model. The cyclothymic, anxious, and irritable temperaments directly worsened the positive and negative affects and the negative appraisal of life events that occurred during the past year, while the hyperthymic temperament had the opposite effects. The subjects of this study were nonclinical volunteers. The findings might not be generalizable to psychiatric patients. This study demonstrated that childhood abuse, particularly neglect, indirectly worsened the well-being of individuals through cyclothymic, anxious, and irritable affective temperaments. An important "mediator" role of affective temperaments in the effect of childhood abuse on well-being was suggested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,731,975
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,284
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,389
of 315,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#41
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.