↓ Skip to main content

Antibodies to malaria vaccine candidates are associated with chloroquine or sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine treatment efficacy in children in an endemic area of Burkina Faso

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibodies to malaria vaccine candidates are associated with chloroquine or sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine treatment efficacy in children in an endemic area of Burkina Faso
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amidou Diarra, Issa Nebie, Alfred Tiono, Issiaka Soulama, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Amadou Konate, Michael Theisen, Daniel Dodoo, Alfred Traore, Sodiomon B Sirima

Abstract

Patient immune status is thought to affect the efficacy of anti-malarial chemotherapy. This is a subject of some importance, since evidence of immunity-related interactions may influence our use of chemotherapy in populations with drug resistance, as well as assessment of the value of suboptimal vaccines. The study aim was to investigate relationship between antibodies and anti-malarial drug treatment outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Kenya 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Burkina Faso 1 2%
Unknown 34 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 10 24%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,807,920
of 12,445,334 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,728
of 3,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,329
of 117,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,445,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.