You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nitrogen Identity Drives Differential Impacts of Nutrients on Coral Bleaching and Mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecosystems, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10021-019-00433-2 |
Authors |
Deron E. Burkepile, Andrew A. Shantz, Thomas C. Adam, Katrina S. Munsterman, Kelly E. Speare, Mark C. Ladd, Mallory M. Rice, Leïla Ezzat, Shelby McIlroy, Jane C. Y. Wong, David M. Baker, Andrew J. Brooks, Russell J. Schmitt, Sally J. Holbrook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
American Samoa | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Scientists | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Unknown | 51 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 22 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 60 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,466,525
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#473
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,240
of 354,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.