↓ Skip to main content

Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Moussaïd, Elsa G. Guillot, Mathieu Moreau, Jérôme Fehrenbach, Olivier Chabiron, Samuel Lemercier, Julien Pettré, Cécile Appert-Rolland, Pierre Degond, Guy Theraulaz

Abstract

In human crowds as well as in many animal societies, local interactions among individuals often give rise to self-organized collective organizations that offer functional benefits to the group. For instance, flows of pedestrians moving in opposite directions spontaneously segregate into lanes of uniform walking directions. This phenomenon is often referred to as a smart collective pattern, as it increases the traffic efficiency with no need of external control. However, the functional benefits of this emergent organization have never been experimentally measured, and the underlying behavioral mechanisms are poorly understood. In this work, we have studied this phenomenon under controlled laboratory conditions. We found that the traffic segregation exhibits structural instabilities characterized by the alternation of organized and disorganized states, where the lifetime of well-organized clusters of pedestrians follow a stretched exponential relaxation process. Further analysis show that the inter-pedestrian variability of comfortable walking speeds is a key variable at the origin of the observed traffic perturbations. We show that the collective benefit of the emerging pattern is maximized when all pedestrians walk at the average speed of the group. In practice, however, local interactions between slow- and fast-walking pedestrians trigger global breakdowns of organization, which reduce the collective and the individual payoff provided by the traffic segregation. This work is a step ahead toward the understanding of traffic self-organization in crowds, which turns out to be modulated by complex behavioral mechanisms that do not always maximize the group's benefits. The quantitative understanding of crowd behaviors opens the way for designing bottom-up management strategies bound to promote the emergence of efficient collective behaviors in crowds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 15%
Physics and Astronomy 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Computer Science 20 12%
Psychology 17 10%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,601,391
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,367
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,643
of 172,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#14
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.