↓ Skip to main content

Detection of NRAS mutation in cell-free DNA biological fluids from patients with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of NRAS mutation in cell-free DNA biological fluids from patients with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13023-019-1191-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michio Ozeki, Yoko Aoki, Akifumi Nozawa, Shiho Yasue, Saori Endo, Yumiko Hori, Kentaro Matsuoka, Tetsuya Niihori, Ryo Funayama, Matsuyuki Shirota, Keiko Nakayama, Toshiyuki Fukao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,850,276
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,255
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,571
of 211,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them