You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Density-dependent effect of allelopathy on germination and seedling emergence in two Ipomoea species
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, September 2019
Zoila Mercedes Aguilar-Franco, Alejandro Flores-Palacios, Alejandro Flores-Morales, Irene Perea-Arango, José de Jesús Arellano-García, Susana Valencia-Díaz
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||12%|
|Student > Master||2||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||47%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Revista Chilena de Historia Natural
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 340,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Chilena de Historia Natural
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.