You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not All Are Lost: Interrupted Laboratory Monitoring, Early Death, and Loss to Follow-Up (LTFU) in a Large South African Treatment Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aima A. Ahonkhai, Farzad Noubary, Alison Munro, Ruth Stark, Marisa Wilke, Kenneth A. Freedberg, Robin Wood, Elena Losina |
| Abstract |
Many HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings are plagued by high rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU). Most studies have not distinguished between those who briefly interrupt, but return to care, and those more chronically lost to follow-up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,491,075
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,224
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,964
of 158,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#483
of 3,514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.