You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sex Differences in Circulating Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily S. Lau, Samantha M. Paniagua, James Sawalla Guseh, Vijeta Bhambhani, Markella V. Zanni, Paul Courchesne, Asya Lyass, Martin G. Larson, Daniel Levy, Jennifer E. Ho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 83 | 36% |
| Canada | 16 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 5% |
| Australia | 11 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 73 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 53% |
| Scientists | 80 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#323,381
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#742
of 16,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,424
of 351,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#18
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.