Intellectual disability and autism: socioeconomic impacts of informal caring, projected to 2030
Royal College of Psychiatrists
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intellectual disability and autism: socioeconomic impacts of informal caring, projected to 2030
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
British Journal of Psychiatry, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjp.2019.204 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Schofield, Melanie J. B. Zeppel, Robert Tanton, J. Lennert Veerman, Simon J. Kelly, Megan E. Passey, Rupendra N. Shrestha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 36% |
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,608,462
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#933
of 6,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,146
of 339,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.