↓ Skip to main content

Biopsy versus resection for high-grade glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biopsy versus resection for high-grade glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G Hart, Gareth RL Grant, Emma F Solyom, Robin Grant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 30%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Computer Science 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,730,321
of 14,143,289 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,571
of 10,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,602
of 260,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,143,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.