↓ Skip to main content

Biopsy versus resection for high-grade glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biopsy versus resection for high-grade glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G Hart, Gareth RL Grant, Emma F Solyom, Robin Grant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 23 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,548,786
of 16,402,841 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,160
of 11,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,326
of 269,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,402,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.