↓ Skip to main content

Complications After Extended Radical Resections for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies: A 25-Year Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complications After Extended Radical Resections for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies: A 25-Year Experience
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07816-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Peacock, Peadar S. Waters, Joseph C. Kong, Satish K. Warrier, Chris Wakeman, Tim Eglinton, Alexander G. Heriot, Frank A. Frizelle, Jacob J. McCormick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 28%
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,400,379
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,141
of 6,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,537
of 340,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#57
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.