↓ Skip to main content

Moving at the speed of flight: dabbling duck-movement rates and the relationship with electronic tracking interval

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moving at the speed of flight: dabbling duck-movement rates and the relationship with electronic tracking interval
Published in
Wildlife Research, January 2019
DOI 10.1071/wr19028
Authors

Fiona McDuie, Michael L. Casazza, David Keiter, Cory T. Overton, Mark P. Herzog, Cliff L. Feldheim, Joshua T. Ackerman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Unspecified 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,140,733
of 16,197,328 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#378
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,065
of 270,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,197,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them