↓ Skip to main content

Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012367.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian S Buckley, Caroline D Sanders, Loukia Spineli, Qiaoling Deng, Joey SW Kwong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Other 16 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 104 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 117 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,686,158
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,626
of 12,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,026
of 328,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.