↓ Skip to main content

Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in the Real World ― From the COMMAND VTE Registry ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in the Real World ― From the COMMAND VTE Registry ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiro Sakamoto, Yugo Yamashita, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidewo Amano, Toru Takase, Seiichi Hiramori, Kitae Kim, Maki Oi, Masaharu Akao, Yohei Kobayashi, Mamoru Toyofuku, Toshiaki Izumi, Tomohisa Tada, Po-Min Chen, Koichiro Murata, Yoshiaki Tsuyuki, Syunsuke Saga, Yuji Nishimoto, Tomoki Sasa, Minako Kinoshita, Kiyonori Togi, Hiroshi Mabuchi, Kensuke Takabayashi, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Hiroki Shiomi, Takao Kato, Takeru Makiyama, Koh Ono, Toshihiro Tamura, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Takeshi Kimura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,585,839
of 14,260,830 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#570
of 1,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,906
of 261,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,260,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.