You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic support in the critically ill: a consensus of 19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2597-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Wernerman, Kenneth B. Christopher, Djillali Annane, Michael P. Casaer, Craig M. Coopersmith, Adam M. Deane, Elisabeth De Waele, Gunnar Elke, Carole Ichai, Constantine J. Karvellas, Stephen A. McClave, Heleen M. Oudemans-van Straaten, Olav Rooyackers, Renee D. Stapleton, Jukka Takala, Arthur R. H. van Zanten, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Jean-Charles Preiser, Jean-Louis Vincent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 15% |
| Mexico | 17 | 10% |
| United States | 14 | 8% |
| Spain | 11 | 7% |
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 30% |
| Scientists | 12 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#421,028
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#234
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,811
of 354,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.