You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing Logic-based and Humor-based Corrections for Science, Health, and Political Misinformation on Social Media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/08838151.2019.1653102 |
| Authors |
Emily K. Vraga, Sojung Claire Kim, John Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 35 | 24% |
| Psychology | 14 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,445,528
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
#98
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,898
of 355,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.