↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors JACC Review Topic of the Week

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
101 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors JACC Review Topic of the Week
Published in
JACC, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somedeb Ball, Raktim K. Ghosh, Sariya Wongsaengsak, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay, Gopal Chandra Ghosh, Wilbert S. Aronow, Gregg C. Fonarow, Daniel J. Lenihan, Deepak L. Bhatt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Unspecified 13 9%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 47 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 43%
Unspecified 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 51 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#777,496
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,934
of 16,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,728
of 364,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#60
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.