↓ Skip to main content

How strong is the effect of invasive ecosystem engineers on the distribution patterns of local species, the local and regional biodiversity and ecosystem functions?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How strong is the effect of invasive ecosystem engineers on the distribution patterns of local species, the local and regional biodiversity and ecosystem functions?
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-1-10
Authors

Gil Rilov, Rebecca Mant, Devin Lyons, Fabio Bulleri, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi, Jonne Kotta, Ana M Queirós, Eva Chatzinikolaou, Tasman Crowe, Tamar Guy-Haim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Greece 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 41%
Environmental Science 19 22%
Engineering 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,012,283
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#27
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,451
of 182,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them