You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adherence to guidelines on documentation required for registration to London GP practice websites: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x705581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan Hodson, Elizabeth Ford, Maxwell Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 68% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#817,660
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#360
of 4,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,241
of 348,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.