You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimated stroke risk, yield, and number needed to screen for atrial fibrillation detected through single time screening: a multicountry patient-level meta-analysis of 141,220 screened individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002903 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Lowres, Jake Olivier, Tze-Fan Chao, Shih-Ann Chen, Yi Chen, Axel Diederichsen, David A. Fitzmaurice, Juan Jose Gomez-Doblas, Joseph Harbison, Jeff S. Healey, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Femke Kaasenbrood, William Keen, Vivian W. Lee, Jes S. Lindholt, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Georges H. Mairesse, Jonathan Mant, Julie W. Martin, Enrique Martín-Rioboó, David D. McManus, Javier Muñiz, Thomas Münzel, Juliet Nakamya, Lis Neubeck, Jessica J. Orchard, Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres, Marco Proietti, F. Russell Quinn, Andrea K. Roalfe, Roopinder K. Sandhu, Renate B. Schnabel, Breda Smyth, Apurv Soni, Robert Tieleman, Jiguang Wang, Philipp S. Wild, Bryan P. Yan, Ben Freedman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 25% |
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,235,370
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,758
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,236
of 360,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#28
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.