↓ Skip to main content

Estimated stroke risk, yield, and number needed to screen for atrial fibrillation detected through single time screening: a multicountry patient-level meta-analysis of 141,220 screened individuals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated stroke risk, yield, and number needed to screen for atrial fibrillation detected through single time screening: a multicountry patient-level meta-analysis of 141,220 screened individuals
Published in
PLOS Medicine, September 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Lowres, Jake Olivier, Tze-Fan Chao, Shih-Ann Chen, Yi Chen, Axel Diederichsen, David A. Fitzmaurice, Juan Jose Gomez-Doblas, Joseph Harbison, Jeff S. Healey, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Femke Kaasenbrood, William Keen, Vivian W. Lee, Jes S. Lindholt, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Georges H. Mairesse, Jonathan Mant, Julie W. Martin, Enrique Martín-Rioboó, David D. McManus, Javier Muñiz, Thomas Münzel, Juliet Nakamya, Lis Neubeck, Jessica J. Orchard, Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres, Marco Proietti, F. Russell Quinn, Andrea K. Roalfe, Roopinder K. Sandhu, Renate B. Schnabel, Breda Smyth, Apurv Soni, Robert Tieleman, Jiguang Wang, Philipp S. Wild, Bryan P. Yan, Ben Freedman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Unspecified 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Unspecified 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 15 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#779,540
of 15,943,149 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,452
of 3,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,234
of 271,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#19
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,943,149 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.