↓ Skip to main content

How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0084555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katia Bruxvoort, Catherine Goodman, S. Patrick Kachur, David Schellenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,184
of 195,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,232
of 305,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,278
of 5,565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.