You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Use of Social Media in Anatomical and Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Biomedical Visualisation
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-31904-5_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-031903-8, 978-3-03-031904-5
|
| Authors |
William Pollock, Paul M. Rea, Pollock, William, Rea, Paul M. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,468,842
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,124
of 4,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,107
of 438,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.