↓ Skip to main content

The Seroprevalence of Pandemic Influenza H1N1 (2009) Virus in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Seroprevalence of Pandemic Influenza H1N1 (2009) Virus in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cuiling Xu, Tian Bai, A. Danielle Iuliano, Min Wang, Lei Yang, Leying Wen, Yuhong Zeng, Xiaodan Li, Tao Chen, Wei Wang, Ying Hu, Limei Yang, Zi Li, Shumei Zou, Dexin Li, Shiwen Wang, Zijian Feng, Yanping Zhang, Hongjie Yu, Weizhong Yang, Yu Wang, Marc-Alain Widdowson, Yuelong Shu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,900,108
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,163
of 195,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,636
of 109,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#570
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.