↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in STD Clinics, Emergency Departments, and Inpatient Units: A Model-Based Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vimalanand S. Prabhu, Paul G. Farnham, Angela B. Hutchinson, Sada Soorapanth, James D. Heffelfinger, Matthew R. Golden, John T. Brooks, David Rimland, Stephanie L. Sansom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Decision Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,682,409
of 24,795,084 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#77,018
of 214,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,632
of 116,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#503
of 1,680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,795,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.