You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Estimating HIV Incidence among Adults in Kenya and Uganda: A Systematic Comparison of Multiple Methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017535 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea A. Kim, Timothy Hallett, John Stover, Eleanor Gouws, Joshua Musinguzi, Patrick K. Mureithi, Rebecca Bunnell, John Hargrove, Jonathan Mermin, Reinhard K. Kaiser, Anne Barsigo, Peter D. Ghys |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 25% |
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Mathematics | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,765
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,336
of 108,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#693
of 1,375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.