↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of Seasonal Influenza A and 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Guatemala

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of the Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of Seasonal Influenza A and 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Guatemala
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015826
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim A. Lindblade, Wences Arvelo, Jennifer Gray, Alejandra Estevez, Gal Frenkel, Lissette Reyes, Fabiola Moscoso, Juan Carlos Moir, Alicia M. Fry, Sonja J. Olsen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 2%
India 1 2%
Guatemala 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,000,484
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,040
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,587
of 185,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#365
of 1,111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.