↓ Skip to main content

Receptor Specificity and Transmission of H2N2 Subtype Viruses Isolated from the Pandemic of 1957

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Receptor Specificity and Transmission of H2N2 Subtype Viruses Isolated from the Pandemic of 1957
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Pappas, Karthik Viswanathan, Aarthi Chandrasekaran, Rahul Raman, Jacqueline M. Katz, Ram Sasisekharan, Terrence M. Tumpey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
China 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 24%
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,184
of 195,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,588
of 94,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#384
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.