↓ Skip to main content

Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003654.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Chen, Muke Zhou, Mi Yang, Jian Guo, Cairong Zhu, Jie Yang, Yucai Wang, Xue Yang, Li He

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a relatively new antihypertensive class. The effect of first-line CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 17%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Mathematics 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,003,980
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,104
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,622
of 117,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.