↓ Skip to main content

PCR-based Sepsis@Quick test is superior in comparison with blood culture for identification of sepsis-causative pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PCR-based Sepsis@Quick test is superior in comparison with blood culture for identification of sepsis-causative pathogens
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-50150-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ngo Tat Trung, Nguyen Sy Thau, Mai Hong Bang, Le Huu Song

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 31 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Chemistry 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,526
of 127,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,911
of 344,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,322
of 3,405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.