↓ Skip to main content

Framingham Risk Score and Alternatives for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Framingham Risk Score and Alternatives for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in Older Adults
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Rodondi, Isabella Locatelli, Drahomir Aujesky, Javed Butler, Eric Vittinghoff, Eleanor Simonsick, Suzanne Satterfield, Anne B. Newman, Peter W. F. Wilson, Mark J. Pletcher, Douglas C. Bauer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,853,368
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#50,122
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,660
of 173,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#730
of 3,722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.