↓ Skip to main content

Ten Simple Rules for Starting a Company

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
58 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten Simple Rules for Starting a Company
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002439
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony C. Fletcher, Philip E. Bourne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Spain 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Portugal 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 171 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Student > Master 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Engineering 11 6%
Computer Science 9 5%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#752,594
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#538
of 9,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,393
of 173,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.