↓ Skip to main content

Collective Dynamics Differentiates Functional Divergence in Protein Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collective Dynamics Differentiates Functional Divergence in Protein Evolution
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler J. Glembo, Daniel W. Farrell, Z. Nevin Gerek, M. F. Thorpe, S. Banu Ozkan

Abstract

Protein evolution is most commonly studied by analyzing related protein sequences and generating ancestral sequences through Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood methods, and/or by resurrecting ancestral proteins in the lab and performing ligand binding studies to determine function. Structural and dynamic evolution have largely been left out of molecular evolution studies. Here we incorporate both structure and dynamics to elucidate the molecular principles behind the divergence in the evolutionary path of the steroid receptor proteins. We determine the likely structure of three evolutionarily diverged ancestral steroid receptor proteins using the Zipping and Assembly Method with FRODA (ZAMF). Our predictions are within ~2.7 Å all-atom RMSD of the respective crystal structures of the ancestral steroid receptors. Beyond static structure prediction, a particular feature of ZAMF is that it generates protein dynamics information. We investigate the differences in conformational dynamics of diverged proteins by obtaining the most collective motion through essential dynamics. Strikingly, our analysis shows that evolutionarily diverged proteins of the same family do not share the same dynamic subspace, while those sharing the same function are simultaneously clustered together and distant from those, that have functionally diverged. Dynamic analysis also enables those mutations that most affect dynamics to be identified. It correctly predicts all mutations (functional and permissive) necessary to evolve new function and ~60% of permissive mutations necessary to recover ancestral function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 7%
France 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 92 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 26%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 22%
Physics and Astronomy 9 8%
Chemistry 6 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 8 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,755,393
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,756
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,127
of 172,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#66
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.