↓ Skip to main content

Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 2,318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
47 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
349 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
39 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
900 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1787 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Bialystok, Fergus I.M. Craik, Gigi Luk

Abstract

Building on earlier evidence showing a beneficial effect of bilingualism on children's cognitive development, we review recent studies using both behavioral and neuroimaging methods to examine the effects of bilingualism on cognition in adulthood and explore possible mechanisms for these effects. This research shows that bilingualism has a somewhat muted effect in adulthood but a larger role in older age, protecting against cognitive decline, a concept known as 'cognitive reserve'. We discuss recent evidence that bilingualism is associated with a delay in the onset of symptoms of dementia. Cognitive reserve is a crucial research area in the context of an aging population; the possibility that bilingualism contributes to cognitive reserve is therefore of growing importance as populations become increasingly diverse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 349 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 2%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Other 21 1%
Unknown 1701 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 298 17%
Student > Master 295 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 293 16%
Researcher 161 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 106 6%
Other 312 17%
Unknown 322 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 591 33%
Linguistics 287 16%
Social Sciences 112 6%
Neuroscience 108 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 4%
Other 240 13%
Unknown 379 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 782. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#25,043
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#7
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67
of 173,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.