You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased Incidence and Clinical Picture of Childhood Narcolepsy following the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Vaccination Campaign in Finland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markku Partinen, Outi Saarenpää-Heikkilä, Ismo Ilveskoski, Christer Hublin, Miika Linna, Päivi Olsén, Pekka Nokelainen, Reija Alén, Tiina Wallden, Merimaaria Espo, Harri Rusanen, Jan Olme, Heli Sätilä, Harri Arikka, Pekka Kaipainen, Ilkka Julkunen, Turkka Kirjavainen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 16 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 61 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 90% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#192,534
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,849
of 225,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#740
of 173,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#35
of 3,699 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,699 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.