↓ Skip to main content

Interceptor® long-lasting insecticidal net: phase III evaluation over three years of household use and calibration with Phase II experimental hut outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interceptor® long-lasting insecticidal net: phase III evaluation over three years of household use and calibration with Phase II experimental hut outcomes
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1490-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Tungu, Matthew Kirby, Robert Malima, William Kisinza, Stephen Magesa, Caroline Maxwell, Benard Batengana, Olivier Pigeon, Mark Rowland

Abstract

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LN) are an effective tool for malaria prevention. The World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme has established evaluation criteria to facilitate registration for public use. A household randomised trial was conducted in Tanzania according to WHOPES Phase III procedures to evaluate the alpha-cypermethrin coated Interceptor® LN (BASF) over three years' use. Outcomes were calibrated against results of Phase II experimental hut trials. Interceptor LN (200 mg/m(2) alpha-cypermethrin) and conventionally treated nets CTN (40 mg/m(2) alpha-cypermethrin) were randomly distributed to 934 households. At 6-monthly intervals, household surveys recorded net use, durability, adverse effects, user acceptance and washing practices. Concurrently, 30 nets of each type were collected and tested for knock-down and kill of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes in cone and tunnel bioassays. Alpha-cypermethrin content of nets was assessed annually. At 12 months 97 % of Interceptor LN met the efficacy criteria by cone or tunnel test; this pass rate declined to 90 % at 24 months and 87 % at 36 months. In contrast only 63 % of CTN met the efficacy criteria at 12 months, 14 % at 24 months and 0 % at 36 months. The alpha-cypermethrin content at 36 months on Interceptor LN was 20 % (42 ± 13 mg/m(2)) of the initial content but on CTNs only 4 % (1.3 ± 1.6 mg/m(2)) remained. Interceptor LN was reported to be used year-round and washed 4.3 times/year. A few recalled facial tingling during the first days of use but this did not deter usage. The average number of holes at 36 months was 18, hole area per net was 229 cm(2) and hole index was 332. Insecticide content and cone bioefficacy of LN and CTN after 36 months' use were similar to that of LN and CTN used in earlier Phase II hut trials, but while the 20 times washed LN tested in experimental huts gave adequate personal protection the 20 times washed CTN did not. More than 80 % Interceptor LN fulfilled the WHOPES Phase III criteria at 36 months and thus the LLIN was granted full WHO recommendation. Phase III outcomes at 36 months were anticipated by Phase II outcomes after 20 standardized washes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,772,627
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,604
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,007
of 300,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#83
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.