↓ Skip to main content

うつ病の診断と治療

Overview of attention for article published in Juntendo Medical Journal, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
うつ病の診断と治療
Published in
Juntendo Medical Journal, January 2005
DOI 10.14789/pjmj.51.386
Authors

荒井 稔

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Other 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,904,913
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Juntendo Medical Journal
#49
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,481
of 147,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Juntendo Medical Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.